Monday, January 14, 2008

Study: $90 Wine Tastes Better Than The Same Wine At $10

Via News.com -

In a study that could make marketing managers and salespeople rub their hands with glee, scientists have used brain-scanning technology to shed new light on the old adage, "You get what you pay for."

Researchers from the California Institute of Technology and Stanford's business school have directly seen that the sensation of pleasantness that people experience when tasting wine is linked directly to its price. And that's true even when, unbeknownst to the test subjects, it's exactly the same Cabernet Sauvignon with a dramatically different price tag.

Specifically, the researchers found that with the higher priced wines, more blood and oxygen is sent to a part of the brain called the medial orbitofrontal cortex, whose activity reflects pleasure. Brain scanning using a method called functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) showed evidence for the researchers' hypothesis that "changes in the price of a product can influence neural computations associated with experienced pleasantness," they said.

The study, by Hilke Plassmann, John O'Doherty, Baba Shiv, and Antonio Rangel, was published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research, along with other studies the authors allude to, are putting a serious dent in economists' notions that experienced pleasantness of a product is based on its intrinsic qualities.

"Contrary to the basic assumptions of economics, several studies have provided behavioral evidence that marketing actions can successfully affect experienced pleasantness by manipulating nonintrinsic attributes of goods. For example, knowledge of a beer's ingredients and brand can affect reported taste quality, and the reported enjoyment of a film is influenced by expectations about its quality," the researchers said. "Even more intriguingly, changing the price at which an energy drink is purchased can influence the ability to solve puzzles."

------------------------------

This is really interesting.

Generally, I have always believed in the old "You get what you pay for" adage, but it has never really been about price for me, it is about quality. Normally, higher-quality products come with a higher price...it is just simple economics. This means that I don't mind paying a bit more for a quality product.

I have a gut feeling that people believe pricey wine taste better than cheaper wine...because they generally aren't very educated about wine. I know that I don't know enough about it.

I think, when people aren't educated about a subject enough to determine quality for themselves, they automatic default to price (as a symbol of quality). Sometimes price does indicate quality...and sometimes it doesn't.

Ground Kona coffee that cost ten dollars per pound must taste better than a less known Mexican whole bean that cost six dollars per pound, right?

Well no. There are many factors that determine quality and price isn't one of them.

My friend wondered how hard it would be to market Lambrusco for $90 a bottle.

No comments:

Post a Comment